Residency requirement for filing divorce proceedings in Quebec

To file divorce proceedings in Quebec either you or your spouse must have one year of continuous residence in Quebec before the divorce proceedings can be taken here.

The fact that the parties were married in Quebec does not mean that divorce proceedings must be taken in Quebec if neither of the parties has been residing in Quebec for one continuous year prior to the date on which the proceedings are taken.

A divorce motion brought in Quebec where neither party has had one year of continuous residence in Quebec will be dismissed.

 

• Top 

Grounds for divorce – marriage breakdown

A divorce may be granted if there has been a “breakdown of the marriage”.

Section 8, subsection 2 of the Divorce Act 1985 defines “marriage breakdown”. It may consist of separation for one year, mental cruelty, or physical cruelty.

Separation for one year

Section 8, subsection 2 a) defines separation for one year as follows:

• the spouses have lived separate and apart for at least one year immediately preceding the determination of the divorce proceeding and were living separate and apart at the commencement of the proceeding;
  

The manner in which the “period of separation” is calculated is defined at section 8, subsection 3:

(a) spouses shall be deemed to have lived separate and apart for any period during which they lived apart and either of them had the intention to live separate and apart from the other; and

(b) a period during which spouses have lived separate and apart shall not be considered to have been interrupted or terminated

(i) by reason only that either spouse has become incapable of forming or having an intention to continue to live separate and apart or of continuing to live separate and apart of the spouse's own volition, if it appears to the court that the separation would probably have continued if the spouse had not become so incapable, or

(ii) by reason only that the spouses have resumed cohabitation during a period of, or periods totaling, not more than ninety days with reconciliation as its primary purpose.

If you are living separate and apart, you are not required to wait for one year to elapse to institute divorce proceedings. A divorce motion may be brought at any time subsequent to the separation, and even prior to the expiry of one year. However a judgment of divorce cannot be rendered until the separation has lasted for one year.

In the divorce motion you must state the date on which the separation occurred. A divorce judgment cannot be rendered until at least one year has expired from that date.

The issues that require immediate resolution can be dealt with while waiting for the year to expire by means of interim or provisional judgments (see stages in a divorce case below)

Spousal misconduct - adultery, mental cruelty, physical cruelty

Section 8, subsection 2 b) deals with “spousal misconduct” (otherwise known as martial fault).  

• (b) the spouse against whom the divorce proceeding is brought has, since celebration of the marriage,
  
  (i) committed adultery, or
  
  (ii) treated the other spouse with physical or mental cruelty of such a kind as to render intolerable the continued cohabitation of the spouses.

When you invoke adultery or mental or physical cruelty you can apply for a divorce right away and are not required to be separated for one year before a judgment of divorce can be granted. In other words a judgment of divorce can be granted in the year following the institution of divorce proceedings.

Many people believe that in the case of spousal misconduct the aggrieved party may obtain an advantage, regarding either the financial or custody issues, as a form of punishment to the guilty party. This is not true.

The fact that one of the parties has committed “misconduct” does not and cannot have any impact on the Court's decision on the accessory issues - custody, support, and division of property.

In this regard see s. 15.2 (5) in relation to support and 16 (8) in relation to custody which both read as follows:

Spousal misconduct

In making an order under subsection (1) or an interim order under subsection (2), the court shall not take into consideration any misconduct of a spouse in relation to the marriage.

 

• Top 

Annulment of marriage

You have 3 years to seek a marriage annulment under Quebec law.

The grounds for marriage annulment are similar in many respects to the reasons that justify the annulment of contracts in civil law.

The most common grounds include:

a) that the required formalities for the celebration of the marriage have not been complied with (for example the official who performed the marriage did not possess the required qualifications to conduct a marriage)

or

b) like any contract, that your consent to the marriage has been obtained by error, fraud, under duress etc. (an obvious example - you believed that you married a woman only to discover after the marriage that the person is a man)

 

• Top 

Stages in a Family Case

There are three stages in the litigation of family cases –
1) interim
2) provisional
3) final

The interim stage covers the period from the date of institution of the proceedings to the date of the provisional judgment.

Interim judgments are rendered only in cases of urgency, and a quick hearing date on ten days notice or even less can be obtained.

The provisional stage refers to the period from the date of the institution of the proceedings to the date of the final judgment.

Provisional judgments, if necessary, retroactively supersede interim judgments and apply going forward to the date of the final divorce hearing.

The principal aim of a provisional judgment is to maintain, as much as possible, the living standard enjoyed by the family while it remained together.

The children will normally remain in the family home, and usually this means that the parent who obtains custody will get possession of the house.

The final stage refers to the judgment rendered at the final divorce hearing and beyond.

A final judgment can apply retroactively and supersede a provisional judgment, and applies going forward into the future unless and until it is modified by a further judgment rendered on a motion to modify based on a future change of circumstances

The three main issues in the case of the breakdown of a marriage are:

• Custody

• Support

• Division of property

 

• Top 

Custody

Jurisdiction in custody disputes - place where custody case should be initiated

In custody matters the Court having jurisdiction is the Court of the place where the child is domiciled.

Article 3142 of the Quebec Civil Code says - A Quebec authority has jurisdiction to rule on the custody of a child provided he is domiciled in Quebec.

Article 75 of the Quebec Civil Code says - The domicile of a person, for the exercise of his civil rights, is at the place of his principal establishment.

In custody matters if there has been a decision on custody rendered by a court the child's domicile is the place of residence of the custodial parent.

If there has been no decision on custody then the child's domicile is the place of his "habitual residence". The child's habitual residence may be different from his actual residence, if one of the parents has moved the child from the place where he lived with both parents to a new geographical area without the consent of the other parent

It should be pointed out that under the Civil Code the Court can exceptionally, even when a child is domiciled in Quebec, decline jurisdiction to hear a custody case regarding that child if it is determined that the Court of another jurisdiction is better placed to decide the issue of custody because the child has a more substantial connection to another jurisdiction. This usually occurs when a child has recently been moved to Quebec from another place.

Criteria for custody

In any custody dispute the interest of the children will always be placed first and foremost by the Court.

The most important criterion in deciding custody is what is in the best interest of the child, and not what is best for the father or the mother.

The courts will give preference to neither the mother nor father in determining custody.

There did exist a principle known as the “tender year’s doctrine”, which determined that, every being equal, custody of a young child (an infant or toddler) would be awarded to the mother. This principle no longer applies in today's law.

The principal factors taken into account in determining custody are the respective parental capacities of the parties (ability to provide for the basic physical and emotional needs of the children), the history of care giving (i.e. who was the primary caregiver during co-habitation), involvement in activities, availability for the children (personal schedules), communication with and attitude towards the other side, willingness to facilitate contact between the children and the other party, what the children may want etc.

Parental alienation – where one parent turns the children against the other by for example speaking badly of the other parent to the children– is considered conduct that is counter-indicative to parental capacity required for custody. Alienation by the custodial parent is a justification for a change of custody.

Children should not be used as intermediaries to send messages to the other parent, nor should there be any discussion of the adult issues in the divorce case with the children (example – “Your mother is taking all my money. She is making me poor”). Such conduct is also considered counter-indicative to parental capacity required for custody.

Definitions

Sole custody

Sole custody means that the children reside with one of the parents for more than 60% of the time. It implies that the parent having custody alone exercises parental authority (i.e. makes final decisions regarding the children). The non-custodial parent has the right to be consulted regarding major decisions that usually concern health, education, religion etc.

“Split” or “shared” Custody

The parties have split custody when the children divide their residential time equally or almost equally between the parents. It is generally understood to mean a division of residential time, (usually over cycles of seven or fourteen days) from a "40 / 60" up to a "50 / 50" basis.

The Quebec Child Support Guidelines define split custody as any arrangement where the children reside with one of the parents over 40% of the time.

The Quebec Superior Court is becoming increasingly receptive to the concept of split custody, as it assures that children maximize their contact and time with both parents.

There is however no presumption in favour of split custody.

Split custody may be imposed, in spite of opposition by one of the parents, if the circumstances show that it has a reasonable chance to succeed.

The Quebec Court of Appeal has stated that split custody may be imposed if the following conditions exist:

• Both parties have parental capacity

• There is a minimal degree of “functional” communication – i.e. – the parties are able to communicate with each other at the very least on issues related to the children

• The parties live relatively close to one another (proximity of residence)

It is recognized that it is in the best interest of children to maximize their time spent with both parents.

Split custody assures that children maximize their contact and time with both parents.

The absence of conflict is not a requirement.

Split custody may be a viable option, even if the parties do not get along, provided that they are both good parents with something important to offer to the children.

Communication need not be perfect, only effective or functional. Difficulty in communicating is not an impediment to the imposition of split custody.

The parties should have a medium or means of communicating information to each other and reaching decisions. Email is an example of such a medium when the parties cannot talk directly to one another.

A total absence of communication (where the parties refuse to communicate with each other by any means) will be counter-indicative to split custody.

Dr. Abe Worenklein (abew@attcanada.ca), a psychologist who has testified as an expert in many custody cases in Quebec over the years provides the following perspective on split custody:

With respect to split custody, the literature is equivocal. It is felt by some that split custody is likely to work with certain parental characteristics and capacities, together with a commitment to the concept of split custody as a fair and moral solution. It furthermore is felt that there are certain characteristics which will make split custody more likely to work. Such characteristics include:

• "a sense of basic respect and trust for one another as parents;
• appreciation of the value of the other parent to the child;
• basic congruency child rearing values for capacity to tolerate existing differences
• a sense of parity with the other parent; and
• the ability of the two parents to communicate with each other vis-a-vis the child"

In fact, split custody is viable only if the parents have demonstrated their capacity to co-operate reasonably and meaningfully in matters pertaining to raising their children.

According to Dr. Richard Gardner, they must show the ability to communicate well and be willing to compromise when necessary to ensure the viability of the arrangement. The key words are co-operation and communication.

According to Gardner many types of parents are poor candidates for a viable split custody arrangement. Amongst such individuals are people who cannot communicate with one another. Furthermore parents who have no basic agreement in the care of child rearing and who demonstrate a lack of co-operation in other areas are also poor candidates for joint custody.

While there is a great deal of controversy as to the relationship between custody arrangements and co-parental communication, few generalisations can be made. In fact, it is felt, that “it is not prudent to make decisions about custody based solely, or even primarily, on the inter-parental relationship.”

In fact, it is pointed out by Kline-Pruett and by Santangelo (1999) that for co-operation and conflict to be useful predictors, they must be more discretely defined since they are affected by other factors.

However, research reviewed recently 5 does not support claims by critics of joint custody "that joint-custody children are likely to be exposed to more conflict or to be at greater risk of adjustment problems due to having to adjust to two households or feeling "torn" between parents.

Split custody arrangements (whether legal or physical) do not appear, on the average, to be harmful to any aspect of children's well-being, and may in fact be beneficial."

Bauserman suggests "that Court should not discourage parents from attempting joint custody". At the same time, he does point out that the results of his research do not support joint custody as preferable to, or even equal to, sole custody in all situations particularly when one parent is clearly abusive or neglectful or when it is clear that a sole custody arrangement may be the best solution. In addition, Bauserman states that in the event that one of the parents does suffer from serious emotional difficulties, children may be affected by repeated exposure to such an environment. He does point out however that in the event of extremes of parental conflict, one needs to consider that possibly split custody may be detrimental.

Yet, at the same time, some research by Bender (1994) indicates that split custody may actually work to reduce levels of parental conflict over time.

In fact, when couples are unable to resolve differences, when conflicts center around child custody and visitation, or when one or the other parent is unwilling to assume parenting responsibilities, forced shared custody and the resulting ongoing litigation can fuel existing conflict to the detriment of both parents and children.

Hetherington and Stanley-Hagen point out "Given ample evidence of the positive association between ongoing parental conflict and ongoing legal disputes and problems in children's adjustment, the practicality of joint custody in the face of continued conflict is questionable."

“Joint” Custody

Joint custody should not be confused with split custody.

It refers only to a situation where the children have their principal residence with one parent and reside with the other parent for up to 40% of the time, but where the parties have agreed to share parental authority or to make joint decisions on important issues.

Parental authority

As a general rule parental authority is shared between the parents during the marriage.

After the parties have separated becomes more difficult and whether or not the sharing of parental authority (joint decision making regarding the children) continues will depend on the custody arrangement chosen by the parties or imposed by the Court.

The Court retains the authority to decide any dispute that may arise between the parties as to the exercise of parental authority that they are unable to resolve themselves. This may involve either a disagreement where decisions are to be made jointly, or in a sole custody situation where the custodial parent has made a decision that the non-custodial parent, who has the right to be consulted, does not agree with.

The sharing of parental authority does not extend to routine day to day matters. Neither parent should interfere on matters involving day to day care while the children are with the other parent, unless there is a very legitimate reason for doing so relating to the best interest of the children being compromised in some way.

Administration of property belonging to minor children

A minor child may have money or property that must be administered.

As holders of parental authority, both parents are legally considered as tutors to their minor children. This does not change after divorce.

Parents exercise legal tutorship jointly. One parent may, however, act for the other for a specific purpose with the other’s consent.

Where the value of the child’s property exceeds $25,000 the Public Curator must be informed and will oversee the administration by the parents of such property. Yearly reports accounting for their administration must be submitted to the Public Curator by the parents in such cases.

In the event of a dispute regarding a decision to be made by both parents in the exercise of their legal tutorship and administration of a child’s property, as in the case of disputes involving the exercise of parental authority, the court may be called upon to arbitrate.

The wishes of children

As a general rule children cannot decide for themselves where they will reside.

Children have the right to be heard in any dispute that affects their interests either directly or through an attorney.

To appoint an attorney a child must have a sufficient level of maturity to articulate what he wants. The attorney then intervenes in the proceedings on behalf of the child only to ensure that what the child wants is brought to the attention of the judge.

The role of a child’s attorney is not to argue what the best interest of the child may be under the circumstances, but only to express the child’s point of view. The Quebec Court of Appeal has held that the role of an attorney representing a child in a custody dispute is to do no more than articulate the wishes of the child and thus act as a porte-parole for the child. It is not to give an opinion on what is best for the child irrespective of the child's wishes.

The testimony of children as to their views and preferences, whether or not they are represented by an attorney, can be heard by a judge and be taken into account. This is most often done in private, in the absence of the parties, but in the presence of the attorneys.

The wishes of children as to where they would prefer to live are taken into account by the Court as one of the relevant factors in determining custody. The weight to be given to such testimony or expressed preference will depend on:

-age

-maturity

-level of articulation

-whether the opinion expressed is rational (makes sense under circumstances)

-whether it coincides with child's best interest

-whether it is based on impulse

-whether it is the result of undue influence by a parent - the Court must be assured however, that the child has expressed his or her wishes free of influence, pressure, and manipulation by either parent.

The wish of a 12 year old child is "largely determinant". This means that although what the child says is not absolutely binding on the Court, it will be given very serious consideration.

The wish of a child between 10 and 12 will be less influential, but nevertheless will be considered carefully.

Where children, subject to a sole custody order, express the desire for split custody, this will be considered a significant change of circumstances and will open the door to a review of the custody order with a view to determining whether the three conditions that favour the imposition of split custody exist.

The special case of adolescent children

Dr. Abe Worenklein describes how to deal with the wishes of adolescent children as follows:

One as well needs to consider that adolescent boys often seek out their fathers in an effort to understand their emerging sexuality and as a means of helping them figure out their evolving concept of maleness. Gould points out that teenagers often respond best "when they actively participate in the creation of a (residential arrangement) routine that is dependable and consistent yet flexible enough to accommodate their emerging and emergent social life".

Helping children recognize and regulate their emotions is a very important parental function. In fact, parents need to accurately identify their children's feelings and validate such feelings reflecting them back to the children so that they (a) have the experience of being emotionally recognized and responded to; and (b) begin to believe that sharing their feelings with others will lead to an alleviation of their distress "from before so that".

It is painful and harmful to children and adolescents when adults misread their emotional signals and do not validate children or do not build up their self-esteem. Clearly, emotional availability and degree of warmth as well as degree of flexibility and permission are important aspects to parenting a child and adolescent.

There is suggestion in the existing literature that "forcing visitations when the adolescent refuses may deepen the alienation between parent and child." Although a parent's rights to visitation are established by the Courts and although a parent is able to assert these rights, a parent needs to weigh this against the developing adolescent's need for autonomy and self-determination and consider the child's needs as well.

Custody Assessments

In a custody hearing experts are often heard to provide the Court with custody recommendations.

Judges generally favour hearing the opinion and recommendations of experts in custody disputes because in theory such evidence is objective, authoritative, and gives the Court reassurance as to what is truly in the best interest of the children.

An expert's report is considered to be persuasive evidence. It is not, however, binding on the Court.

An expert’s opinion will be most persuasive when the judge concludes that the expert has been neutral, objective, and has applied the correct and appropriate principles in order to arrive at his conclusions.

An expert's report will be rejected when the Court has reason to question the expert's objectivity, or when it is shown that the expert's analysis is flawed in some way - he has failed to take into account certain important facts, has misinterpreted the facts, or has erred in his application of the principles on which his report is based.

To make custody recommendations an expert must conduct a psycho-legal assessment in which he interviews and assesses both parties and the children, and observes their interaction.

A party cannot be compelled to submit to an assessment.

However a negative inference will be drawn from a party’s refusal to be assessed.

If both parents do not participate in the assessment, and for example the expert assesses the children and one of the parents only, custody recommendations cannot be made and the expert can only report on his assessment of the children and parent evaluated.

Often the parties to a custody dispute agree on one joint expert and share the cost.

At other times one of the parties may prefer to engage his or her own expert, in which case each party has their own expert, there are two assessments and unless the experts agree both testify at the hearing to convey their opinions and recommendations. It may also happen that the other party does not engage his or her own expert and simply cooperates or does not cooperate with the expert chosen by the other side.

If the parties agree on a joint assessment the Court can be asked to refer them to the Court Assessment Service (Service de mediation et d’expertise). The service is free. It usually takes two or three months to be referred to an expert who will either be a social worker or psychologist, and a report can be expected in about six months. In Montreal the service can be reached at 514-393-2285.

Private assessments do not generally take as long.

A custody assessment will usually involve interviews, observation of interaction both at the expert’s office and by way of home visits, gathering of information from pertinent outside sources, and psychological testing.

An overview of psychological testing

Testing is used to obtain objective as opposed to clinical data and to determine if there is pathology

Dr. Abe Worenklein identifies and describes the tests that are usually administered as follows:

The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory III (MCMI-III) is a true / false self-report inventory which is objectively scored. It consists of 175 items, which are used to evaluate behavioural patterns and personality styles. In fact, it is felt by several researchers that the MCMI is suitable for forensic assessments including custody evaluations. Personality instruments such as the MCMI can provide the psychologist with valuable information on the parents’ personality traits and any possible clinical symptomatology that may have an adverse effect on the nature of the particular environment that the parents provide for the child. One needs to recognise, however, that using the MCMI in child custody evaluations, there is no single personality trait or group of characteristics that ensures that one would be a good or poor custodial parent and consequently, these results need to be placed in the context of a complete child custody evaluation, in which direct observation can be made of parent/child interaction, in a manner which will allow hypotheses about one’s personality style in the assessment of both the strengths and deficits in parenting potential.

The Emotional Quotient Inventory consists of 133 items and employs a five point response set (ranging from “not true of me” to “true of me”). A well-functioning successful and emotionally healthy individual is one who possesses a sufficient degree of emotional intelligence and an average or above average EQ score. “On the other hand, lack of success and the existence of emotional problems are a function of the extent and degree of deficiency in the EQ score.

The Intrapersonal EQ Scale , which pertains to the assessment of the inner-self, taps interpersonal capacity and functioning

The Adaptability EQ Scale examines how a person is able to cope with environmental demands and deal with problematic situations

The Parent/Child Relationship Inventory (PCRI) assesses parents’ attitudes toward parenting and toward their children. What is noteworthy about this inventory is that it provides a quantified description of parent/child relationships that complements other assessment procedures. It helps to put qualitative impressions in perspective by making normative comparisons possible. In fact, it was felt by the author of the PCRI that it may prove especially useful in child custody settings that specifically address the needs of children. The PCRI is designed to identify specific aspects of the parent/child relationship that may cause problems and to give an overall picture of the quality of the relationship. The PCRI is divided into seven content scales reflecting the major features of parenting and the parent/child relationship as well as validity indicators. The content scales are Parental Support, Satisfaction with Parenting, Involvement, Communication, Limit Setting, Autonomy and Role Orientation. High scorers on the PCRI scales indicate positive parenting characteristics and good parenting skills, and low scores indicate poor parenting skills.

The Parenting Satisfaction Scale (PSS) is a self-report measure that may be completed in different settings. It is a 45 item standardised assessment of “parents’ attitude toward parenting”. Scores derived from this scale allow a professional to define, compare and communicate levels of parenting satisfaction in three different areas:

• Satisfaction with Spouse/ex-spouse Parenting Performance
• Satisfaction with the Parent/Child Relationship
• Satisfaction with Parenting Performance

Moving away with a child subject to a custody order

A custodial parent seeking to leave the province and change the child's residence is the equivalent of a request to change the court-ordered custody and access arrangement.

To succeed a material change in the child's needs, or the parents' ability to meet those needs, must be demonstrated.

A move out of the province, that was not contemplated or reasonably foreseeable when the original custody and access order was made, is considered to be such a material change.

Once an unforeseeable intention to move is shown, the focus then changes to a fresh consideration of the child's best interest in light of the move.

The Supreme Court has established seven criteria to look at in order to determine whether the move is in the child's best interest:

• The existing custody arrangement and relationship between the child and the custodial parent.
• The existing access arrangement and the relationship between the child and the access parent.
• The desirability of maximizing contact between the child and both parents.
• The views of the child.
• The custodial parent's reason for moving, only in the exceptional case where it is relevant to that parent's ability to meet the needs of the child.
• The disruption to the child of a change of custody
• The disruption to the child resulting from his or her removal from family, schools, and the community he or she has come to know.

The younger a child is the more importance the Court will place on maintaining the child's bond with the primary caregiver.

The weight to be given to the maintenance of the bond with the primary caregiver will, however, decrease as the child gets older.

The Court will also want to make sure that the move is not intended specifically to prevent the non-custodial parent from exercising access.

 

• Top 

International abduction of children

Where a child has been unlawfully removed from another jurisdiction to Quebec the Loi sur les aspects civils de l'enlevement international et interprovincial d'enfants, L.R.Q., c. A-23.01 applies.

This legislation enables the aggrieved parent to petition the Quebec Superior Court to order the return of the child to the jurisdiction from which the child has been taken, for the purpose of a hearing there to determine who is to have custody of the child.

In order for the Loi sur les aspects civils de l'enlevement international et interprovincial d'enfants to apply there must be an “unlawful removal” of a child from another jurisdiction to Quebec.

The removal of a child is considered illegal and the Loi sur les aspects civils de l'enlevement international et interprovincial d'enfants will apply when such removal violates a “right of custody” in the jurisdiction where the child had his “habitual residence”.

The parent asking for the return of the child has the burden of proof to show that the Loi sur les aspects civils de l'enlevement international et interprovincial d'enfants has application, and more particularly that at the time of the removal he or she was exercising a “ right of custody” that has been violated, and also that the child has his “ habitual residence” in the place to which the request for return is being made.

A “right of custody” refers to the exercise of parental authority, and more particularly to the right to decide the child’s place of residence.

The “habitual residence” of the child is determined by looking at the reality for the child, and not by trying to ascertain the intentions of the parents as to their place of residence.

Where there has been a change of residence, a new habitual residence is acquired if an appreciable period of time has elapsed, of duration necessary for the child to have developed ties with, and to have shown signs of integration into, his new environment.

If the parent asking for the return of the child proves that the Loi sur les aspects civils de l'enlevement international et interprovincial d'enfants applies, the burden shifts to the removing parent to prove that one of the exceptions outlined in the statute to the return of the child applies.

The most commonly pleaded exception is that the return of the child will place him at risk or in an “intolerable situation”.

What needs to be shown is defined as follows:

“…. the risk has to be more than an ordinary risk, or something greater than would normally be expected on taking a child away from one parent and passing him to another….not only must the risk be a weighty one, but it must be one of substantial, and not trivial psychological harm. This is the effect of the words “or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation”

The potential harm caused by returning the children and thereby removing them from the care of their principal caregiver (assuming that the removing parent is the primary caregiver) is usually alleviated by the imposing of conditions to the return of the child on the parent requesting the return.

Some of the conditions that have been imposed on the parent seeking the return of the child are:

• to pay the expenses of the trip back by the removing parent
• not to impede the entry of the removing parent into the country to which the child is being returned
• to renounce to any custody judgment obtained and to agree that the custody issue and all related matters shall be decided anew
• to provide lodging for the removing and child
• to pay the expenses of the removing and children to a maximum of $X per month during period necessary for custody issue to be determined
• to cover all necessary medical expenses for the removing parent and the child
• to consent to a custody hearing at the earliest date
• to share physical custody until hearing

 

• Top 

Financial Support

 

Child Support

In Quebec, as in the rest of Canada, child support has been “defiscalized”- i.e. it is neither taxable to the recipient, nor tax deductible to the payor.

The amount of child support payable in Canada is determined according to Guidelines that have been established by the government.

There are two sets of guidelines that are used depending on the residence of the parties.

Federal Child Support Guidelines

The Federal Guidelines will apply if the debtor ordinarily resides outside of Quebec.

The Federal Guidelines for the province where the debtor resides will apply.

If the debtor does not reside in Canada it is the Federal Guidelines for Quebec that apply.

Information concerning the Federal Guidelines is available at:
Department of Justice - Canada - Child Support

Quebec Child Support Guidelines

If both parties are Quebec residents the Quebec Guidelines will apply. Information concerning the Quebec Guidelines is available in English at:

The Quebec model for the determination of child support payments

Income tax and support payments - Ministere du Revenu du Quebec

Child Support Determination Form (Acrobat File .pdf)

The factors taken into account are:

• the number of children
• the gross incomes from all sources of both the father and mother
• the amount of residential time of the children with each party

Calculating “income” for determination of support under the Guidelines

“Gross income” from all sources, both direct and direct, is used for support determination.

This means that all amounts received directly, and all benefits received indirectly, must be included in the calculation of the amount of income for the application of the Child Support Guidelines.

“Indirect income”

Monies received and declared for tax purposes, for which there are T-4s or T-5s, are received on a gross basis and are included in the calculation at the amount paid and received.

It often happens that a person's real income includes amounts that are received indirectly, or are received directly but are undeclared, and thus are not included in his taxable income.

Indirect payments may take the form of benefits consisting of “perks”, including the payment of personal expenses by the payor’s employer, or the payment of monies to a holding company or trust designated by the payor.

The debtor may also be recipient of direct undeclared cash payments.

Indirect payments most often occur when a payor is self-employed and can control how he is paid, and how much he is paid directly.

An employee may receive a benefit, in the form of a payment of a personal expense that is made on his behalf by his employer, or a corporate entity that he directs. In such a case he benefits personally by having an expense, which he would otherwise have to pay with gross pre-tax dollars, paid on his behalf with dollars on which he has no tax liability.

Such payments are deducted by the employer as business expenses while the employee may not include the value of the personal benefit derived in his income.

For purposes of support determination the net dollar value of the benefit is “grossed up” or raised to its pre-tax value, and it is the gross value of the benefit that is added to the employee’s income.

As an example - a person earning $100,000 per year is in the 50% tax bracket. Every dollar paid out on his behalf in personal expenses when grossed up to its pre-tax value must be doubled and is thus worth $2. Thus when calculating a person’s income for support determination purposes a payment of a personal expense such as a restaurant meal or a car payment of $100 must be doubled to $200.

Undeclared or cash income that can be proven is considered as well for support determination as net income that must be "grossed up" to its pre-tax value.

Thus what a person declares to the tax authorities for income tax purposes is relevant and indicative, but is not conclusive for purposes of determining capacity to pay support. Gross income declared for tax purposes may not include all of a person’s sources of income. For example it will not include personal expenses paid for that person by his company or employer. There may also be deductions taken to calculate a person’s taxable revenue, such as depreciation of physical assets, which are not pertinent for purposes of support determination.

Failure to disclose income

The Court also has the discretion to arbitrarily determine a person’s income for support determination if it concludes that income has been hidden, and it is impossible to specifically quantify the amount in question

Abandonment of a revenue generating activity

If it is proven that a party has voluntarily abandoned a revenue generating activity, in the case of a support debtor to avoid the payment of support (for example by taking voluntary early retirement) or in the case of a support creditor (for example by leaving employment to return to school) to increase the amount of support payable, the Court will deem that the activity never ceased and make its support determination as though the debtor’s income has not changed.

Special case - where a party tries to avoid financial disclosure by admission of capacity to pay

Calculating residential time

To calculate residential time the number of days per year that the child spends with each parent must be calculated. Since fractions of days are to be included in the calculation, the Courts have held that counting the total number of hours in the year that the children spend with each parent, and then dividing by 24 to obtain the number of days per year, is the most accurate way to determine residential time for the application of the support Guidelines.

There are 8,760 hours in the year (365 days x 24 hours per day).

Special expenses

Over and above the "base amount" of support, there are "special expenses" that are calculated, added on in the appropriate place on the Support Determination Form, and factored in to determine the amount of child support payable.

The addition of the special expenses to the base amount thereby increases the amount that the debtor parent pays.

The expenses that qualify as “special” are the net cost of daycare (the cost after deduction of tax benefits), post-secondary school expenses, and certain other expenses that qualify as "special" because they are necessitated by the child's particular situation, including private school expenses such as tuition, books, uniform, school trips etc., extra curricular activities, and as well medical, dental, orthodontic expenses etc.

• Top 

Claim for child support against a non-biological parent

In 1999, it was settled by the Supreme Court of Canada that child support can be claimed from a non-biological parent if that person has voluntarily acted as a parent to the child (i.e. assumed the role of a parent and has acted in loco parentis).

It is important to point out that a claim for support against a non-biological parent is not lost because the biological non-custodial parent is already paying support.

In such a case the obligations of the biological and non-biological parents become solidary -i.e. the amount of support required can be claimed from either or from both

 

• Top 

Where a child is over 18 years of age and is a student

If a child who is 18 or older resides at home the parent with whom he or she lives may apply for child support from the other parent.

Child support does not automatically stop when a child turns eighteen years of age, but may continue through CEGEP (or junior college), and even beyond if the child attends university, and is a serious student.

A student's right to continue to claim support from his or her parents after 18 years of age has its basis in the parents' basic continuing obligation to provide education.

The Courts accept a university education today as a necessity for obtaining and maintaining gainful employment. It is no longer considered a luxury.

To be entitled to claim support a university student must demonstrate that he or she is a serious student. This is determined by the practicality of the chosen field of study, the student's regular attendance in classes, and the obtaining of passing grades.

An isolated failing grade will not be a bar to continuing support.

It must be shown that the student's parents have the financial means to contribute.

The level of education reached by the parents is considered.

The student must contribute to minimizing his or her needs, in collaboration with his parents, by working during the summer and taking the necessary steps to apply for all loans and bursaries for which he or she is eligible.

If the parents clearly have the financial means to easily assure the child's university education, the court will not insist that a student borrow and incur indebtedness to provide for his or her needs.

Support for a university student need only be paid during the academic year, and not during the summer when a student can obtain summer employment.

The notion of costs in relation to studies is to be interpreted largely, and may include tuition, transportation, books, and materials.

The Child Support Guidelines do not apply, and only serve as a guide.

Under art. 2 of the Regulation regarding the application of the Quebec Guidelines, there is only a presumption that the Guidelines apply.

This means that the Court is not bound to apply the Guidelines, and has the discretion to apply a different amount.

The Guidelines amount is normally used only as a point of reference from which to start. From there, amounts are either added or subtracted, depending on the circumstances, to arrive at the amount awarded.

As an example in some cases the Guidelines amount has been taken and then reduced by one-third (1/3) to take into account the student's revenue from employment.

In other cases the Guidelines amount has been reduced by the amount of loans and/or bursaries obtained as well as employment revenue.

 

• Top 

Where a child over 18 does not reside with either parent

A child who resides with neither parent may act on his own to claim support.

When a child over 18 years of age acts on his own to claim support from one parent or both, the provisions of the Civil Code of Quebec apply, and not the Child Support Guidelines, with the consequence that support is to be claimed and awarded on a gross pre-tax basis (as in the case of spousal support)

 

• Top 

Spousal Support

Spousal support can either be compensatory or non-compensatory in nature, or both.

Compensatory support is due when it is determined that at the time of marriage breakdown the recipient has suffered economic or financial disadvantages as a result of the marriage and/or its breakdown.

As an example, a spouse will be considered disadvantaged by the marriage if he or she has interrupted a career or remained off the labour market to stay at home and care for children.

A spouse will be considered disadvantaged by the breakdown of the marriage if the marriage provided certain financial benefits for the creditor spouse that effectively ceased with the separation.

Non-compensatory support is based on the social obligation that marriage produces requiring one spouse to help the other, independently of any financial disadvantages having their origin in the marriage.

An example of this is the case where one of the spouses has been financially autonomous for a period of time, but then becomes ill during the marriage and can no longer work. At the time of the divorce it would be an unfair consequence of the marriage breakdown to terminate the financial assistance that the disabled spouse had been receiving up to that point simply because of the divorce.

Kinds of support orders

Periodic spousal support (e.g. weekly or monthly payments etc.) based on a written agreement or court order is taxable to the recipient, and tax deductible to the payer.

Support may also take the form of a lump sum payment.

Lump sum payments are neither taxable to the recipient, nor deductible to the payer.

Lump sum payments are granted to fulfill specific alimentary needs, which may include the purchase of a home or car, the payment of a debt etc.

A lump sum is also considered appropriate as an up front payment of support to achieve what is called a "clean break" between the parties.

Determination of Spousal Support

The determination of spousal support is based on the financial "means and needs" of the parties.

Its purpose is to ensure, as much as is possible, the financial resources required to maintain the lifestyle enjoyed by the recipient spouse during the marriage.

Establishing the means to pay spousal support

SEE

Calculating “income” for determination of support

The same principles apply to calculating income for payment of spousal support as those referred to above for purposes of the determination of income for the calculation of child support.

Establishing the need for spousal support

Like the debtor, the spousal support creditor will be asked to complete a form referred to as a “Statement of Revenues and Expenses”.

Statement of Income Form. Used when making or defending a claim for spousal support (Acrobat File .pdf)

The following will be of help in understanding how to read a “Statement of Revenues and Expenses”

The creditor’s net revenues (gross income less income taxes) is first calculated to arrive at his or her net disposable income.

The creditor’s net disposable income is then added to the amount of child support payable, as the case may be, to arrive at his or her total net income

The creditor’s expenses (which are expressed in net dollars) are then subtracted from the amount of total net income. This will usually result in there being a net deficit if spousal support is required.

The net deficit is then “grossed up” to its pre-tax value to determine the amount of spousal support needed which is payable to the creditor in pre-tax dollars.

What this means is that the deficit is expressed in net after tax dollars while spousal support is payable in gross before tax dollars. Thus it must be determined what the gross dollar equivalent of the net deficit is. This is the amount of spousal support that should be claimed.

The foregoing presupposes that the creditor’s expenses that have been taken into account are realistic and are reflective of the lifestyle that can reasonably be expected based on the total revenue that is available to the family.

Determination of support at the final divorce hearing

At the final hearing the amount of spousal support payable will be determined by the Court after it decides how the assets subject to the family patrimony and matrimonial regime will be divided (see below).

The division of property is made first, and then the Court looks at the needs of the recipient taking into account the benefits, if any, that result from the assets that are received.

Spousal support with a fixed term

One of the court's objectives in making a spousal support order will be to promote the economic self-sufficiency of the creditor spouse within a reasonable delay, when this is possible.

Self-sufficiency is usually possible when the creditor is relatively young, in good health, is available to work, and either has skills or has had skills in the past.

A "transitional period" is often required to allow time for recycling or re-training. Re-training may take the form of brushing up on old skills. Recycling involves acquiring new skills.

Recycling will be allowed at the expense of the other party, and support fixed accordingly, if the creditor can prove that there is a link between his or her state of dependence (i.e. the need to re-train to acquire employment) and the marriage.

As an example, a link of this nature will be found if the creditor spouse left the labour market during the marriage with the agreement (express or implicit) of the other party to care for the children of the marriage.

It should be noted that the court will usually not tolerate a decision by a creditor spouse, who already has skills and is employable, to recycle in order to change careers. This is not a case where recycling at the time of the marriage breakdown is necessary, and in such circumstances the debtor spouse should not be obliged to assume the costs of such a personal choice.

Is it possible to avoid financial disclosure by simply admitting one’s capacity to pay the amount of support claimed?

On the first page of the Statement of Revenues and Expenses which must be completed by both parties where there is a claim for spousal support, there is a textbox that can be checked off allowing a support debtor to admit his capacity to pay the amount of support claimed, while denying the right of the creditor to claim that amount, and thus avoid a detailed financial disclosure.

Such an admission is possible, however, only in the case of a claim for spousal support, and it would be done in order to avoid the filing of the required Statement of Revenues and Expenses in which a sworn disclosure of all sources of income and assets, whatever they are and wherever they are, is required.

In the case of the Child Support Determination Form there is no equivalent textbox allowing for an admission of a debtor's capacity to pay. This is because child support is calculated based on the Guidelines in which the income of the parties is a key variable in the equation, and in which the net worth of the debtor may become a factor if there is a claim that support be granted beyond what the Guidelines provide for.

Making an admission of capacity to pay might be done by a support debtor to avoid intrusion into his financial affairs, where the amount claimed is less than what the debtor believes he might have to pay if his income and his net worth were disclosed and became known.

The Court can, however, in spite of such an admission and on request of the support creditor, make an order that a full disclosure be made. This would be the case when a full disclosure is necessary in order to ensure a complete solution of the issues in the case.

A recent case that I pleaded illustrates the danger of an admission of capacity to pay.

The husband had a very substantial net worth, in the millions. The wife was claiming child support and spousal support. She had no idea of what the husband's specific financial means were, nor what his net worth was. She had no choice but to guess, and completed the Child Support Determination Form by attributing an income of $500,000 per year to the husband and calculating her claims for child and spousal support accordingly.

The husband had reasons for not wanting to make any disclosure, and replied by admitting the amount of yearly income attributed to him. Basically he said "if my wife says that I have an income of $500,000 per year, then this is what it is". He asked to be relieved of the obligation to file a Statement of Revenues and Expenses on the basis of this admission.

The Superior Court ordered the husband to make a full disclosure and file a completed Statement of Revenues and Expenses and supporting documents, consisting of his tax returns for the last five years.

The Court reasoned that, given the circumstances of the case, only a full financial disclosure would enable the judge to arrive at a complete solution and determine what would be fair and equitable in terms of spousal support. The Court added that the husband was obliged in any event to file a Child Support Determination Form with all of the required information. This decision was confirmed in the Court of Appeal.

Indexation of support orders

All alimentary pensions are subject to indexation on January 1 of every year by law in accordance with the rate fixed by the government.

The following tables provide the rates that have applied from 1980 to 2003: *

Starting Date Rate   January 1, 1980 9% January 1, 1981 9,9% January 1, 1982 12,3% January 1, 1983 11,2% January 1, 1984 6,7% January 1, 1985 4,4% January 1, 1986 4,0% January 1, 1987 4,1% January 1, 1988 4,4% January 1, 1989 4,1% January 1, 1990 4,8% January 1, 1991 4,8% January 1, 1992 5,8% January 1, 1993 1,8% January 1, 1994 1,9% January 1, 1995 0,0%

Starting Date Rate   January 1, 1996 2,3% January 1, 1997 1,5% January 1, 1998 1,9% January 1, 1999 0,9% January 1, 2000 1,6% January 1, 2001 2,5% January 1, 2002 3% January 1, 2003 1.6% January 1, 2004 3.2% January 1, 2005 1.7%

* NOTE: The above table is for informational purposes only. All efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of the data in the following table, but neither Andrew H. Heft nor any representative assume any responsability for the accuracy or reliability of the data. Anyone relying solely to this table assumes all responsability of the consequences of this use.

 

• Top 

Modification of support orders

Generally a support order may be modified when there is an important change in any factor that is determinant of the amount payable.

In the case of a support order based on an agreement (as opposed to a determination by a judge) the change must relate to something that was unforeseen at the time that the agreement was entered into – such that it can be said that had the new situation been known then the parties would have made a different agreement.

It is important to ensure that information about the revenues of the parties is exchanged regularly – in the case of child support at least once per year after the filing of tax returns.

When the debtor is a salaried employee, and is paying spousal support by written agreement or court order, it is important to ensure that his or her deductions at source be adjusted to obtain immediate effect of the reduced net cost of such payments.

Collection of Child and Spousal Support - the Act to Facilitate the Payment of Support

Since May 1, 1997, under the Act to Facilitate the Payment of Support, the Minister of Revenue of Quebec is charged with the enforcement of support orders and the collection of both spousal and child support. Lawyers have been removed from the collection process.

All support orders are automatically registered with the Minister of Revenue of Quebec. It usually takes about one month for the Minister to begin its collection procedure. This means that the support debtor makes his payments to the Minister of Revenue and the support creditor receives her payments from the Minister. Thus, as a general rule, there are no more direct relations between the parties regarding the payment of support.

For judgments rendered prior to May 1, 1997, in the event of default in order for the Act to Facilitate the Payment of Support to apply and for the Minister to intervene and impose its collection procedures, the support creditor must register the default with the Minister.

Generally, where a debtor is employed, the support payments due are automatically deducted from his paycheque in the same manner as his deductions at source.

Where the debtor is self employed the Minister will issue an order to remit the amount payable as the support payments become due. Failure to comply will result in seizure, assuming that a self-employed debtor has assets that are apparent and can be seized.

Problems may arise where a self-employed debtor’s assets are not apparent or easily traceable. The Ministry of Revenue has demonstrated that it does not have the time or resources to do the detailed investigation that is often required to uncover hidden assets.

The Court of Appeal has now confirmed that support creditors have the right to use lawyers to collect outstanding support payments if they so choose.

Exemption from application of the Act to Facilitate the Payment of Support

It is important to point out that the parties to a support order can ask the Court for an exemption from the application of the Act to Facilitate the Payment of Support, and deal with each other directly.

To be granted the exemption the support debtor must deposit security with the Minister usually equivalent to three months worth of support payments.

Thus in the event of default (which will automatically trigger the application of the Act to Facilitate the Payment of Support) the Minister will have funds to pay the support creditor for three months while it gets its collection process into gear.

Certain special situations in the collection of support

Where a support debtor transfers assets to a third party

It may happen that a debtor transfers assets, which could be used to satisfy a claim or judgment debt against him, to a third party, and thus attempts to hide his assets or to make himself appear unable to pay or insolvent.

A person is insolvent when his liabilities exceed the value of his assets.
If the transfer is made for a price which is less than the fair market value of the asset (the asset is disposed of for less than it is worth), and the debtor is insolvent at the time or the transaction renders him insolvent, the court will deem it to be made with intent to defraud and will be set aside on application.

If the transfer is made for fair market value it may still be set aside if the debtor is insolvent or the transaction renders him insolvent, and the third party transferee knows of the debtor's insolvency. In such a case the transaction is also deemed to be made with intent to defraud and will be set aside on application.

If the third party is "related" to the debtor (the debtor and third party are not dealing at arm's length) he is deemed to have knowledge of the debtor's state of insolvency. Otherwise knowledge of insolvency must be shown for intent to defraud to be proven.

An action to set aside a fraudulent transfer must be brought within one year of the date when the creditor acquires knowledge of it.

Contempt of court - Intentional refusal to respect a support order

In family cases, a support debtor will be found to be in contempt of court where there is a clear order providing for the payment of financial support and it is deliberately ignored.

The hearing of a charge of contempt of court in a family case follows the rules that apply to penal or criminal proceedings.

If found guilty of contempt, a person may face a fine and/or imprisonment.

The accusation of contempt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

This is the only time in a civil case where the burden of proof exceeds the normal requirement that the plaintiff prove his case by a balance of probabilities i.e. - more probable than improbable.

A contempt hearing is a three step process:

1) the petitioner must prove first that the Defendant has violated a court order.

2) the Defendant must then provide a sufficient explanation for not respecting the order.

3) If such an explanation is provided the burden shifts back to the petitioner to prove the falsity of the explanation or that the excuse provided is neither justified or legitimate.

In family cases, particularly in the case of deliberately defaulting alimentary debtors, or debtors who structure their financial affairs in such a manner as to render themselves judgment proof, the Courts routinely impose prison sentences where it appears that the imposition of a fine will prove useless. The sentences handed out have been as high as four to five months.

A common practice is to order a term of imprisonment and at the same time provide that the debtor can free himself and thus avoid serving his sentence, by paying the arrears of support owing.

This can be effective on a practical basis. In a recent case that I pleaded this kind of a sentence was ordered, and when the police went to execute the arrest warrant the debtor suddenly found the money to pay the arrears due, which up to that point had been accumulating for two years.

“Provision for Costs” - payment of legal fees by the other party

One party can be ordered to pay the legal fees and costs of the other. This is called a “provision for costs”.

A provision for costs is most often awarded when there is gross discrepancy between the financial means of the parties in order to level the playing field and thus to assure the protection and exercise of the rights of the financially disadvantaged party.

It may be awarded at any stage of the case, and there may be several provisions for costs awarded if the circumstances so warrant.

As with financial support the issue is one of means and needs - the means of the party who is paying and the needs of the party who is asking that his or her fees be paid.

The Court usually requires a detailed estimate of anticipated fees and disbursements, including experts' costs.

There are many specific reasons that justify a provision for costs such as the nature, seriousness, and importance of the proceedings, the anticipated duration of the proceedings, the good or bad faith and behaviour of the parties, whether the rights of children are in issue etc.

The Courts do not favour granting a provision for costs if its effect will be to fuel unnecessary litigation or judicial guerrilla warfare.

 

• Top 

Division of Property

 

The matrimonial regime

Your right to a division of property will be based on your matrimonial regime.

In Quebec, at divorce or in the case of legal separation, property is divided based on the "matrimonial regime" adopted at the time of the marriage.

Unlike other jurisdictions where there is no choice as to how marital property is to be divided, in Quebec the parties can pre-determine how they will divide such property at divorce based on which matrimonial regime they choose.

There are essentially two types of matrimonial regimes to choose from:

1. Partnership of Acquests
2. Separation as to Property

In Quebec you can by contract of marriage, entered into before or during the marriage, choose between partnership of acquests or separation as to property or modify your matrimonial regime during the marriage from one regime to the other.

If you have not entered into a marriage contract, the law decides your regime for you.

Partnership of acquests

Those who married after July 1, 1970 without a marriage contract are subject to the legal regime of partnership of acquests.

If you have not signed a marriage contract then you will most likely fall under the legal regime of partnership of acquests. The guiding principles may be summarized as follows:

• assets acquired by the parties before the marriage or received during the marriage by inheritance remain their private property
• all other assets are acquests and subject to division at the time of divorce such as salaries, revenues from investments or from a business enterprise
• during the marriage each party administers his or her own property (i.e. – the property in his or her own name)
• at the time of divorce the assets on hand are determined to be acquests or private property, and each party is then entitled to one-half of the value of the acquests of the other, while conserving his or her private property.

Separation as to Property

If you have signed a marriage contract you probably have adopted the regime of separation as to property. Under this regime there is only private property. There are no acquests or common property unless there are assets that have been purchased jointly in both names. Each party remains sole and exclusive owner of the assets that are registered in his or her name, administers these assets during the marriage, and retains them at divorce.

Community of Property

Married couples that have not entered into a marriage contract and who were married before July 1, 1970, are subject to the regime of community of property, which was the legal regime then in existence.

Community of property is considered archaic and less often seen. Under this regime most of the assets that the parties owned before the marriage and acquired during the marriage are considered to be joint or common property at divorce.

During the marriage the husband alone administers the assets that make up the community. The wife only administers her "reserved property" which comprises those assets that are purchased with her salary and are the product of her work.

At divorce each party conserves his or her private property and has the right to one-half of the common community property.

While community of property still technically exists in the law, it is rarely chosen as it dates back to the time of church influence in the law and traditional marriage. The civil law has evolved as the institution of marriage has become more and more secular and less traditional relationships have achieved legal recognition.

If you married outside of Quebec , the regime applicable will be that of the place where you were "domiciled" (intended to reside) at the time of the marriage. Most countries have regimes similar to Quebec's legal regime of partnership of acquests.

Liability for debts of other party

Whatever matrimonial regime is adopted neither party is directly liable for the other's debts.

In the case of partnership of acquests, however, the other party’s acquests (or his property in which you would have the right to share) will be exposed to his creditors, and can be seized to satisfy his debts. In this way you may become indirectly liable as your share in the division of your spouse’s acquests can become less if his creditors intervene and seize his property before any division of the acquests is made.

 

• Top 

The Family Patrimony

What is included

In Quebec since July 1, 1989 certain traditional "family assets" have been subject to what is known as the family patrimony.

The net values of these assets are usually divided evenly between the parties, unless the Court decides otherwise. An unequal partition is possible in the case of “injustice”, but remains the exception.

The family patrimony assets generally comprise

• the family residence
• secondary residences used by the family
• furniture used by the family
• motor and recreational vehicles used by the family
• private pension plans
• registered retirement savings plans
• admissible gains accumulated during the marriage under the Quebec Pension Plan

The net value or increase in value, determined at the time of divorce, of these assets is divided.

In making a final division of property the Court first applies the family patrimony provisions.

Thus even if you have a marriage contract which makes you separate as to property, there will be a division of the assets included in the family patrimony.

Such a division must take place unless you have legally opted out of the application of the family patrimony provisions. To have done so you would have signed a deed to that effect before a notary prior to the expiry of the delay for doing so in 1990.

The valuation of the assets subject to division in the case of both the family patrimony and partnership of acquests is made, as a general rule, as of the date on which the proceedings are instituted.

By exception and on on request, the valuation may be made as of the date of separation, providing that the parties have lived financially independent of one another since that time.

When determining the value of family patrimony assets for partition it is important to remember that it is the net value of these assets which is divided - that is the fair market value at the date of evaluation less any debts contracted specifically in relation to any such particular asset for its purchase, improvement or maintenance.

To arrive at the net value for partition of a house it has been held by the Quebec Court of Appeal that the cost of the sale of the property (the real estate commission) should be deducted, even if the parties do not have the intention to sell.

Contrary to popular belief, the application of the family patrimony provisions does not make you a co-owner of family patrimony assets belonging to your spouse.

Each party only has the right on divorce (referred to as a personal right against his or her spouse) to request that the net values of the family patrimony assets be divided. The right to request division arises only on divorce or the death of one of the spouses.

It is important to remember and understand that in partitioning the family patrimony assets, it is not the assets themselves that are divided, but only their “net partitionable values”. Each spouse remains owner of the family patrimony assets registered in his or her name. It is only the total “net partitionable value” that is calculated and then divided equally between the parties. Such a division normally results in one spouse being entitled to a payment from the other to equalize the net partitionable amounts credited to each party. The payment may be made in the form of a lump sum or the transfer of an asset.

Deductions that each spouse may claim

For assets that fall into the family patrimony but were acquired before the marriage, the current fair market value of the asset remains partitionable.

However, certain deductions may be taken from the fair market value, in favour of the owner, under article 418 CCQ in order to arrive at the net partitionable value of the asset, or the amount actually included and subject to division.

Asset owned at the time of marriage

The owner is entitled to a deduction for the net value of a family patrimony asset that was owned at the time of the marriage (and thus brought into the marriage), and as well to a further deduction for the " plus-value" calculated on this value.

The plus-value is the increase in value since the marriage of the said amount proportionately to the ratio existing at the time of the marriage between the net value and the gross value of the property".

The following example illustrates how the net partitionable value of a family residence would be calculated - having a value of $99,000 at the time of the marriage without any mortgage registered against it at that time, and today having a value of $180,000 still free and clear of mortgages:

 

 

Inclusion
Present fair market value		$180,000
Deductions
1. increase in value during the marriage
present value		$180,000
value at marriage		$99,000
increase in value		$81,000
2. proportionate increase
increase in value	X	net value at marriage
		gross value at marriage
81,000	X	99,000
		99,000
	=	$81,00
Total deductions		$162,000
Partitionable value		$180,000
LESS
Deductions		$162,000
Net partitionable value		$18,000

 

Gifts and inheritances

When the net value for partition is calculated each party may obtain a deduction in his or her favour from the net value for partition of the amounts of any gifts or inheritances used to acquire or improve an included family patrimony asset.

There is as well the right to a further deduction for the " plus-value" calculated on the value of the gift or inheritance, or based on the amount by which the gift has increased in value during the marriage proportionately to the value of the asset that it was used to acquire and/or improve.

Renunciation to right to claim deduction

If a family patrimony asset, such as a house, was owned prior to the marriage and then during the marriage the spouse who is the owner makes the other spouse a co-owner (transfers a one-half interest to the other party) so that at the time of divorce the parties own the asset jointly, the right to claim the deductions referred to above may be lost. Making the other spouse co-owner will result in the renunciation to the right to take the deductions.

The Statement of Family Patrimony which must be completed by the parties illustrates how the calculation of the net value for partition is made.

The exception of unequal partition

The Court can order an unequal division if an equal partition results in an injustice to one of the parties.

Injustice justifying an unequal partition occurs for example if one party has sold off family patrimony assets to avoid partition, if one party has purposely avoided accumulating family patrimony assets while being entitled to share in the family patrimony assets of the other etc.

The injustice required cannot, however, result from the application of the law – where, in the absence of particular circumstances, the fact of division of the family patrimony results in unfairness.

Splitting family patrimony assets prior to the divorce judgment

It may happen that, after separation and prior to the institution of divorce proceedings, divorcing parties divide the family patrimony assets between themselves on an unequal basis, believing that the division so made is binding upon them. Such a division may in reality constitute a renunciation to an equal partition. It is fine if the agreement is incorporated into an agreement that is later approved by the court.

If, however, the agreement is never submitted to the court for approval, and one of the parties later for any reason, decides that he or she does not wish to abide by the division of assets made, the entire division can be set aside.

Simply put, you should not proceed to any division of family patrimony assets on an unequal basis, and expect the agreement to be enforceable, unless you are able to confirm the agreement in a signed written document and are reasonably assured that the Court will approve it.

In fact a renunciation to the equal partition of the family patrimony is valid only if:

a) before the judgment of divorce, if it is made in a judicial declaration (i.e. confirmed by a judgment) recorded in the course of the divorce, proceedings;

OR

b) after the judgment of divorce, if it is made in a notarial deed which is then registered at the registry office within one year of the date of a judgment of divorce.

 

• Top 

Pre-nuptial agreements in Quebec

Prenuptial agreements do not exist under Quebec law.

In Quebec you have the option to choose between the matrimonial regimes of separation as to property and partnership of aquests. These two regimes are intended to determine how your marital property will be divided at the time of divorce.

The matrimonial regime will determine how all of the assets belonging to each of you are to be treated except - the family residence, the moveable effects garnishing the family residence, the cars and RRSPs an all forms of pension plans and rights. The latter group of assets are divided subject to the "family patrimony" provisions of the Civil Code of Quebec, which are different from the rules established by the applicable matrimonial regime.

A pre-nuptial agreement cannot supplant either the family patrimony law or the matrimonial regime, both of which sets of rules are of "public order". This means that you cannot by private contract stipulate out of either the family patrimony law or the matrimonial regime.

Thus your pre-nuptial agreement will have no effect on the division of property that must take place

Claiming a Compensatory Allowance

During the marriage spouses are under an obligation to make proportionate contributions in money and services to what are known as the "charges of the marriage" - i.e. raising the children, taking care of the household, providing financially for the needs of the family etc.

It often happens that at the time of divorce one of the parties realizes that he or she has done more than is required, or over-contributed in money and/or services, with the result that the other party's net worth is correspondingly enriched.

The division of the family patrimony may not redress this discrepancy.

Compensatory allowances are most often awarded when the parties are separate as to property. They are awarded only exceptionally under the regime of partnership of acquests.

Examples of excessive contributions include working as an employee of a successful business enterprise owned by the other party, contributing to the acquisition of an asset registered in the name of the other party, giving up a career to care for children and thereby relieving the other party to successfully pursue a career and build equity, supporting the other party while he or she is being educated to pursue a career etc.

To succeed in a claim for a compensatory allowance you must prove:

1. your contribution

2. the enrichment of the other party

3. the "causal link" or connection between the contribution and the enrichment

The enrichment must be subsisting or remain at the time of divorce. If by that time, for example, the other party has lost everything or gone bankrupt, no award will be made.

 

• Top 

Mediation

Mediation is compulsory only to the extent that the parties must confirm to the Court that they have considered it as an option and do not wish to engage in it.

Mediation requires the Consent of both parties.

Before a contested case can be fixed for hearing the parties must assure the Court that they have tried mediation and it has failed, or that either of them refuses to mediate.

A judge can, however under article 814.2.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, adjourn a hearing and refer the parties to the mediation service at the Court or the mediator of their choice.

The suspension of the hearing cannot be for more than 90 days.

The parties must begin the mediation process no later than the 20th day.

If the parties fail to do so, or the mediation ends or fails prior to the expiry of the period during which the case has been suspended, either party may apply to have the hearing resume immediately.

 

• Top 

Settlement conference with a judge

A settlement conference with a judge (conference de reglement a l'amiable) is a procedure that is available after litigation has begun - not before proceedings have been taken.

In such a conference the judge does not make any decision that is binding on the parties. He acts like a mediator does to try to get the parties with the assistance of their attorneys to resolve the issues that are in dispute and are being litigated.

The advantage lies in the fact that a judge's suggestion to the parties of what they might expect the Court to decide if the case goes to trial should be more persuasive in terms of inspiring the parties to evaluate their respective risks in going to trial and to make the necessary compromises to arrive at a settlement.

Also unlike ordinary mediation, where the attorneys are absent, the parties attend such a meeting with the judge with their attorneys who are there to advise them but play a passive role in the discussions that take place between the parties directly with the judge.

Like mediation nothing that is said during such a settlement conference is admissible in the litigation.

 

• Top 

Appealing a judgment in family cases

In all cases that are litigated a judge must decide two things;

a) what the facts are

b) how to apply the law to the facts

A judge decides what the facts are based on the conclusions that he draws from the evidence made before him, including the documents submitted and the testimony given.

In drawing conclusions based on the testimony that he has heard the judge also has to assess the credibility of the witnesses who appear before him.

A judge must then decide how to apply the law to his factual conclusions. In doing so he must interpret the law in a manner consistent with legal precedent (the jurisprudence).

An appeal is the right remedy if there is good reason to believe that the trial judge has erred in his findings of fact or in his application of the law, with the result that his decision would have been different (and in your favour) had the error not been made.

A judge makes an error of fact when he errs in the conclusions that he draws as to what the facts of the case are. Because the trial judge hears the witnesses, and is considered the sole arbiter (person who decides) of the facts, the Court of Appeal requires that an error of fact be "manifest" or evident in order for it to intervene. It has been said that a manifest error is one which “jumps off the page”.

An error of law occurs when a judge wrongly interprets or applies a provision of law to his findings of fact.

Delay to appeal

An appeal must be filed within thirty days of the date of the judgment in the Superior Court.

Permission to Appeal

In divorce cases (cases decided under the Divorce Act) there is an automatic right of appeal in all cases (whether the judgment is interim, provisional, or final).

In cases decided on the basis of the provision of the Civil Code of Quebec (for example - separation cases), permission to appeal from the Court of Appeal must be obtained regarding interim and provisional orders. Final judgments do not require permission.

In Quebec approximately one-third (1/3) of all appeals taken are successful.

Appeals of interim and provisional judgments, which are temporary in nature, rarely succeed. To have any chance it must be shown that an extreme injustice results from the decision.

 

• Top 

Particular Issues

Nullifying a separation agreement

When the parties have signed an agreement which appears to settle all the issues accessory to the divorce (i.e. custody, support, division of property etc.) it is still possible to put the agreement into question before it is approved by the court, and even to do so after the judgment of divorce has been rendered.

The Supreme Court has stated that separation agreements should not be set aside lightly.

A separation agreement will not be set aside because in hindsight a party realizes that it is simply unfair, unreasonable, or disadvantageous.

To set aside a separation agreement it must be shown that the negotiating process was contaminated.

This is done by raising the validity of the contesting party’s consent to the agreement.

To be valid a consent must be informed.

Informed consent

There must be a full and complete financial disclosure on both sides and nothing significant must be hidden.

Neither party can misrepresent any facts that are material to reaching the agreement.

Both parties must fully understand what is being agreed to and should be properly advised by independent attorneys as to their legal rights.

The negotiating atmosphere must be serene and neither party should feel constrained to sign by pressure or threats.

When, at the time of the divorce hearing, a party asks that a separation agreement not be approved, the Court must hear the case and decide, as it does in every contested case, what is just and equitable under the circumstances. The agreement will not be binding on the judge, although it will constitute an important factor to be considered.

After divorce judgment – delay to set aside an agreement on division of property

Once a judgment has been rendered confirming and ratifying a separation agreement, the provisions dealing with the division of the assets subject to the family patrimony and/or partnership of acquests (the patrimonial provisions of the agreement) cannot be set aside unless the motion seeking such relief is served and filed at court within 15 days following the discovery by the petitioner of the error which induced him to sign or the new evidence proving misrepresentation by the other side.

This delay may be extended to 6 months on the condition that it was impossible for the petitioner to act sooner.

 

• Top 

Declaration of Family Residence

It often happens that the family residence is registered in the name of one of the parties only, and not both.

To prevent the house from being sold or mortgaged by your spouse without your consent you can register a “Declaration of Family Residence” at the land registry office.

Once you have registered a declaration of family residence your spouse cannot sell, mortgage, or convey any rights in the property without your consent.

 

• Top 

Seizure of assets before judgment of divorce

“Moveable property” owned by one party, and in the possession of the other party, may be seized in the initial stages of the case before any judgment is rendered.

Assets that form part of the family patrimony or partnership of acquests may be similarly seized to place them under “judicial custody”, to prevent their disappearance, and thus guarantee that they will be available when the times comes for division.

A seizure before judgment can also be done to secure a claim for a compensatory allowance.

If you can show that there are objective reasons to fear for the recovery of what you are asking because the other party is liquidating or hiding assets to avoid having to pay you what a divorce or separation judgment may order, you may also seize before judgment.

Seizing before judgment usually means that, pending the divorce hearing, the seized assets are inventoried by a bailiff and left where they are, or entrusted to remain with the other party as guardian.

The act of seizure has the effect of placing the assets under judicial custody, which means that they cannot be moved, tampered with, or sold.

The removal of a seized asset is considered theft.

If there is cause to believe that leaving a seized asset in the hands of the other party may result in its disappearance, a third party guardian can be named and physical possession of the assets will be entrusted to him.

 

• Top 

Admissibility of tape recorded evidence

The Courts have held that a tape recording of a conversation made without the knowledge of the party being taped is admissible where the welfare and best interest of children are concerned.

Such a tape recording can be admitted into evidence if it relates to a subject pertinent to the custody dispute.

To be admitted into evidence the entire tape recording must be submitted and the authenticity of the tape recording must be proven – i.e. it must be shown that the other parent is actually the person who has been taped.

The Courts have held that a tape recording of a conversation made without the knowledge of the party being taped is admissible where the welfare and best interest of children are concerned.

Such a tape recording can be admitted into evidence if it relates to a subject pertinent to the custody dispute.

To be admitted into evidence the entire tape recording must be submitted and the authenticity of the tape recording must be proven – i.e. it must be shown that the other parent is actually the person who has been taped.

 

• Top 

Rights and Obligations of Grandparents

Since 1996 grandparents may no longer be called upon to provide financial support for their grandchildren. The obligation to provide financial support between ascendant and descendent relations is limited to the first degree - i.e. between parents and their children only.

A child has the right to maintain contact and continue a relationship with his or her grandparents.

The child's parents may not interfere with the personal relations between the child and his grandparents unless there is a serious reason. If the parents and grandparents cannot agree on the extent of such relations, the court may be called upon to decide what they will be. As always the best interest of the child is the key criterion.

A hearing to determine the rights of grandparents involves a three step process:

1. The hearing starts with a presumption that the maintenance of relations is in the best interest of the child. This presumption is, however, subject to rebuttal proof.

2. The parents are obliged to show a serious reason that justifies denying or curtailing the child's access to his grandparents.

3. The court then decides what access rights are appropriate, if any.

Grandparental access may take the form of visits, telephone contact, letter writing, or family get-togethers. What form is adopted will depend on the circumstances of the case.

The following case (that I pleaded) illustrates the importance of grandparental access:

While mentally ill the father shot and killed the wife's father and seriously wounded her mother. The father was found to be insane at the time of the incident. He was acquitted of the criminal charges brought against him and was committed for treatment to Pinel Institute.

The father's parents sought access to the couple's 2?-year-old child.
The mother refused, not wanting to have any relations with the father's family.

The judge held that, despite what the father had done and the mother's anger, the paternal grandparents had been close to the child before the incident and it was in the child's interest to maintain contact with his paternal grandparents and the paternal side of the family

 

• Top 

The Death of a Spouse Prior to Divorce – Claims against the estate by the surviving spouse

The death of a spouse at puts an end to the marriage.

In the case of ongoing divorce proceedings, if at any time prior to the rendering of a judgment of divorce one of the parties dies, the proceedings are considered terminated and at an end. Any provisional judgments then lapse.

The surviving spouse has three potential claims against the estate of the spouse that has died – for the partition of the assets subject to the family patrimony, for a compensatory allowance, and for spousal support

Spousal support may be claimed for a maximum period of twelve months payable by lump sum.

A lump sum ordered against an estate can be made payable either immediately or by installments.

The limit on the amount of support that the surviving spouse may claim from the estate is calculated as follows:

• where support was being paid at the time of death:
• the amount of support payable cannot exceed the LESSER of 12 months support OR
• 10% of value of the estate

• where support was not being paid at the time of death
• the amount of support payable cannot exceed the difference between
• ? of the share that the surviving spouse would be entitled to if there was no will AND
• what the surviving spouse receives by way of will (assuming that he or she has been included in the will)

The Court has discretion to determine the amount of support to be paid to the surviving spouse, which can be less than the maximum amount payable. The approach taken by the Court should be liberal, flexible and show sensitivity to the present and future needs of the surviving spouse.

The right to claim the partition of the family patrimony includes the right to claim an unequal partition.

An unequal partition can be requested against the estate of the deceased spouse. It must be shown that an equal partition would result in an injustice. The injustice may not, however, result from the application of the law which requires that there be a division of the family patrimony assets. It must be shown that the deceased spouse acted in bad faith such that it would be unfair for there to be an equal partition of the family patrimony assets with the estate.

The surviving spouse may also bring a claim for a compensatory allowance against the estate based on an excessive contribution in money or services during the marriage that resulted in the enrichment of the deceased spouse, and by extension at his death of his estate.

The right to claim support and to the partition of the assets subject to the family patrimony are considered “charges” upon the succession .This means that they are claims against the estate that must be resolved and paid before the heirs can be paid. The heirs are thus paid from the assets left over after the surviving spouse takes his or her share of the family patrimony, is paid a compensatory allowance if applicable, and is paid what is determined to be due on account of spousal support.

 

• Top 

Can one spouse sue another in damages?

One spouse cannot sue another in damages as a result of marital misconduct.

The sanctioning of conduct in breach of a marital obligation must be exercised by way of an action in divorce or separation based on the recourses available on marriage breakdown under the Divorce Act and Civil Code of Quebec.

A claim in damages may only be made by one spouse against another, either joined to an action in divorce or separation or by way of a separate independent action, if it is based on fault that does not have its origin in the breach of a marital obligation.

Examples of this are theft by one spouse from another, assault causing bodily harm and the like.

 

• Top 

Removal of barrier to religious marriage

The following question has been often asked:

“I am contemplating asking for a divorce. My husband has mentioned in our negotiations to date that unless I agree to certain conditions that he wants to impose he will not grant me a Jewish religious divorce - known as the ghet. I have heard that the law does not allow this. Can you clarify this for me.”

S. 21.1 of the Divorce Act deals with "the removal of barriers to religious marriage".

In essence if the spouse setting up the barrier (i.e. the barrier being refusing to grant the ghet) is the Plaintiff, and the procedure set out in s. 21.1 is followed, the Court has the power to dismiss that spouse's divorce application. If the spouse is the Defendant, the Court may dismiss any proceedings filed by that spouse.

The intention is to prevent a spouse from threatening to withhold a religious divorce in order to extract concessions, monetary or otherwise, in the civil divorce proceedings against the other spouse.

S. 21 .1 of the Divorce Act reads as follows:

21.1 (1) In this section, "spouse" has the meaning assigned by subsection 2(1) and includes a former spouse.

Affidavit re removal of barriers to religious remarriage
(2) In any proceedings under this Act, a spouse (in this section referred to as the "deponent") may serve on the other spouse and file with the court an affidavit indicating

(a) that the other spouse is the spouse of the deponent;

(b) the date and place of the marriage, and the official character of the person who solemnized the marriage;

(c) the nature of any barriers to the remarriage of the deponent within the deponent's religion the removal of which is within the other spouse's control;

(d) where there are any barriers to the remarriage of the other spouse within the other spouse's religion the removal of which is within the deponent's control, that the deponent

(i) has removed those barriers, and the date and circumstances of that removal, or

(ii) has signified a willingness to remove those barriers, and the date and circumstances of that signification;

(e) that the deponent has, in writing, requested the other spouse to remove all of the barriers to the remarriage of the deponent within the deponent's religion the removal of which is within the other spouse's control;

(f) the date of the request described in paragraph (e); and

(g) that the other spouse, despite the request described in paragraph (e), has failed to remove all of the barriers referred to in that paragraph.

Powers of court where barriers not removed
(3) Where a spouse who has been served with an affidavit under subsection (2) does not

(a) within fifteen days after that affidavit is filed with the court or within such longer period as the court allows, serve on the deponent and file with the court an affidavit indicating that all of the barriers referred to in paragraph (2)(e) have been removed, and

(b) satisfy the court, in any additional manner that the court may require, that all of the barriers referred to in paragraph (2)(e) have been removed,

the court may, subject to any terms that the court considers appropriate,

(c) dismiss any application filed by that spouse under this Act, and

(d) strike out any other pleadings and affidavits filed by that spouse under this Act.

Special case
(4) Without limiting the generality of the court's discretion under subsection (3), the court may refuse to exercise its powers under paragraphs (3)(c) and (d) where a spouse who has been served with an affidavit under subsection (2)

(a) within fifteen days after that affidavit is filed with the court or within such longer period as the court allows, serves on the deponent and files with the court an affidavit indicating genuine grounds of a religious or conscientious nature for refusing to remove the barriers referred to in paragraph (2)(e); and

(b) satisfies the court, in any additional manner that the court may require, that the spouse has genuine grounds of a religious or conscientious nature for refusing to remove the barriers referred to in paragraph (2)(e).

Affidavits
(5) For the purposes of this section, an affidavit filed with the court by a spouse must, in order to be valid, indicate the date on which it was served on the other spouse.

Where section does not apply
(6) This section does not apply where the power to remove the barrier to religious remarriage lies with a religious body or official.

 

• Top 

Co-habitation (“common law” relationship)

Where there are no children

In the event of separation there are generally no proceedings to take, assuming that there is no dispute over the division of jointly held property or the dissolution of a de facto partnership, each takes what belongs to him or her either based on:

the terms of a prior co-habitation agreement
or
agreement reached at the time of separation

Where there are children

In the event of separation the proceedings taken will generally involve a motion for custody and child support.

• Top 

The cost of divorce

The anticipated cost of divorce will depend on whether the case is a contested one or not.

A contested case is one where the parties cannot agree on all of the outstanding issues applicable to the case and require the Court’s intervention to decide their dispute.

An uncontested case is one where the parties agree on the resolution of the outstanding issues applicable to the case, and are able to put their agreement in writing in the form of a Consent to Judgment which they sign and submit to the Court for approval.

Most lawyers will charge a flat fee for processing an uncontested case – usually $2,000 or less. To this will usually be added the sum of $159, which is the amount charged by the Court to issue the divorce proceedings – referred to by lawyers as a “disbursement”, plus the applicable GST and PST taxes.

In a contested case an hourly fee will be charged, usually based on the number of years of experience of the attorney taking the case. Hourly fees range from a low of $100 per hour to $300 per hour and up.

It is difficult for a lawyer to accurately estimate what a contested divorce will cost until the facts are made known to him or her and the issues can be reasonably defined. Even then all an attorney can usually do is provide a “ballpark” figure.

I would be pleased to discuss how my particular fees are determined if you enter into direct communication with me.

 

• Top 

Motion for divorce that is not contested – documents that must be filed

Where one party files divorce proceedings and the other does not contest, the case proceeds as an uncontested one.

If there is no Contestation, after 20 clear days you must prepare an "Inscription for Judgment by Default".

With the Inscription you must file the following documents into the Court record of your case:

• an Attestation relative to Births (art. 22 of the Rules of Practice)
• a draft judgment
• the exhibits
• the birth certificates of the parties
• the birth certificates of the children - but only if their legitimacy is in question (23 Rules of Practice)
• the marriage contract
• the deed of renunciation to the family patrimony provisions - if such a renunciation has been signed in 1989 or 1990
• the sworn declaration under article 827.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure if either child or spousal support is to be paid - as follows:
• the Child Support Determination Form if child support is to be paid - the information contained in this form must be validated by a Clerk of the Superior Court if you have not used the "Aliform " software.
• a Statement of Revenues and Expenses if spousal support is to be paid
• your signed Consent to Judgment on Accessory Measures (i.e. your separation agreement)
• detailed affidavits signed by both parties detailing and confirming the grounds for divorce, that there has been no collusion or pardon, and that there is no possibility of a reconciliation

Assuming that you properly complete the file, it will take three to four months to get a divorce judgment because of the delays it normally takes at Court to process your file.

 

• Top 

Filling a joint divorce motion in an uncontested case

What are the advantages of a joint application?

A joint motion does not have to be served on the other party and thus saves the cost of using a bailiff.

A joint motion does not require a notice of presentation.

An ordinary motion for divorce must be presented to the Court no earlier than 30 days subsequent to the date of its issuance. On the date of presentation the parties either proceed before the Court to obtain a judgment of divorce by making their evidence orally in front of the judge if the file is then ready, or they may ask that the file be referred for judgment and then, or shortly after if the file is not yet complete, deposit all of the necessary documentation.

If, however, you proceed by joint application there is no need to present your request to the Court by way of notice of presentation at least 30 days subsequent to the date of issuance of the joint application. You simply issue the joint application without any notice, and attach all of necessary documentation comprised of the substantiating affidavits, the exhibits, Child Support Determination Form (if there is child support payable, article 827.5 declaration required by the Minister of Revenue for the collection of Child and/or Spousal Support), and a draft judgment, to complete the record so that the Court has everything that it needs to render a judgment of divorce.

The Court then processes your file, and assuming that everything is done properly, both parties should receive the divorce judgment in the mail about three months later without the necessity of having to appear in Court.

 

• Top 

Divorce – other party won't "sign"

The question is often asked – “how do I get a divorce if my spouse will not agree to divorce me or will not sign?”

There is no such thing as "signing for divorce".

If your spouse says that he or she will not agree to divorce you must bring a motion asking for a divorce, and as well asking that the Court make the orders necessary to resolve all of the accessory issues relating to custody, access, support, and division of property.

If you and your spouse can come to an agreement on the issues that need resolution, you can sign a Consent and ask the Court to make the consent part of the divorce judgment.

If there is no agreement your case will proceed as a contested one, in which case you will need to do everything required to complete the Court file to get a hearing date. Assuming that there are no unusual delays, it will take 12 to 18 months to get to a final hearing.

 

• Top 

Date when you can legally remarry after a judgment of divorce

You cannot remarry legally until you are officially divorced.
Your divorce becomes final on the 31st day after the date on which the divorce judgment is rendered.

If the divorce judgment, for example, is dated January 1, then you are only legally divorced 31 days later or as of February 1. You will not be free to remarry until then.

 

• Top 

Enforcing a foreign divorce judgment in Quebec

A divorce granted in another jurisdiction can be recognized in Quebec on a motion broght before the Court here for an order recognizing the foreign divorce judgment and declaring it executory in Quebec.

If the judgment was validly obtained abroad in accordance with the laws of the foreign jurisdiction in question, and your spouse was validly served and was aware of the process abroad by which the judgment was obtained, the petition will be granted and you will have an enforceable divorce judgment here in Quebec.

Having an enforceable divorce judgment in Quebec may be necessary if one of the spouses has moved here with the children and a foreign custody or access order must be enforced, or if there are assets in Quebec that are subject to an order for support or division of property in the divorce judgment.

 

• Top 

Deductibility of Legal Fees for Income Tax Purposes

Federally, the payer cannot deduct legal fees incurred to establish or modify a child and/or spousal support obligation.

In Quebec legal fees incurred for the purpose of modifying a child and/or spousal support obligation are not deductible. However, for the taxation years 2000 and following legal fees paid in respect of establishing the initial obligation to pay child and/or spousal support can be deducted.

Legal fees to obtain a divorce or to obtain custody are not deductible.

It is thus possible that only a portion of one's legal costs are deductible, depending upon the specific reason for which such fees have been incurred.

 

• Top 

Maiden name - use after marriage in Quebec

Article 393 of the Civil Code states - "In marriage both spouses retain their respective names, and exercise their respective civil rights under those names". This means that after marriage a woman’s maiden name remains her name for legal purposes.

Article 56 of the Civil Code says - "A person who uses a name other than his or her own name is liable for any resulting confusion or damage"

If you intend to use a hyphenated name, as long as you include your maiden name in the hyphenated name that you intend to use, you will most likely not cause the kind of confusion envisaged by article 56 as the name used will sufficiently identify you and should not cause third parties with whom you may enter into contracts to confuse you with someone else or to be unable to identify you.

 

• Top 

How to prepare for the first meeting with a lawyer in a family case

You should bring all the documents and information necessary to start a file including:

• the marriage contract (if there is one)
• the original or photocopy of the birth certificates of the children, your spouse, and yourself (assuming that you have them or that they can be obtained)
• to obtain certificates for births or marriages registered in Quebec you must fill out an application that can be obtained at any Caisse Populaire, CLSC, or office of the Directeur de l'etat civil

For more information contact the Directeur de l'etat civil
o Montreal region 514-864-3900
o Outside Montreal 800-567-3900
o Website: Le Directeur de l'Etat Civil

• the address of the last common residence of your spouse and yourself, and both of your current addresses
• a summary inventory of the assets which you acquired as a couple and a list of your debts with supporting documents or invoices
• a summary of the grounds to be invoked
• a list of the demands which you wish to bring before the Court
• your tax returns for the last three (3) years with all of the schedules and attachments thereto
• the details regarding your salary and employment benefits, including a pay slip with your accumulated earnings for the year to date
• if you operate a company - the financial statements for the last three (3) years
• your bank statements
• statements regarding any securities that you own, including RRSPs and pension plans
• any other document which you believe would be relevant to the proceedings

For purposes of the family patrimony it is important to know the values of your RRSPs and pensions accumulated between the date of the marriage and the date of the institution of divorce proceedings or the date of the separation.

 

• Top